Dear Experts,
I created PR with account assignment P with WBs element but this information is not showing in CJI5 Commitments, When I create PO this updating in CJI5.
In CJI5 - I selected all check box of PR+PO+others, still no data exists for PR.
Please Suggest
Thanks,
Hello All,
In IM30 screen we have following currency
Object Currency = CAD
Controlling Area Currency = USD
The issue is when I change the currency from object currency(CAD) to controlling area currency(USD) then the conversion for Current Budget is not happening as per conversion ratio maintained in OB08.(CAD/USD = 0.95162) Am I missing anything?
Hi All,
Please tell me where the data for the field DROPT-PTIME from transaction IM32 gets stored. I have to download data for the period and relate it to PRNAM and upload to new system.
Hi,
In Current project scenario we are not Using Progress analysis..only tracking activities on Star date and end date....
I have been old to do basic Configuration settings for Progress anlysis(Earned Value analysis)...
Could anybody tell me the basic steps or what things should i consider for this configuration..?
Hi all,
I have a WBS structure with let's say 2 levels of WBSe, one WBse at level 1, 2 at level 2.
I want to :
- calculate the POCs at WBSe level 2, then aggregate them at level 1, using weighted WBSe.
- run the RA calculation for all WBSe.
The first part is working ok with measurement methods in WBSe, weights in CJ20n on WBSe level 2 : transaction CNE1 to calculate POC, then transaction CNE5 : I get the correct POC on level 2, and the aggregated POC at level 1.
But when I run the result-analysis calculation (KKAJ) for the whole project : POC is displayed correctly on WBSe level 2, but the aggregated POC is not used in WBSe level 1, and therefore RA results are wrong at level 1 : I always get 0 in the POC for the WBSe level 1, or sometimes 100 if I play with the OKG3 parameters.
The only clue I have is that, in table COSR used to store the POC, on the SKF for Result-Analysis usage, I get 3 lines :
- one with value type P1, with 0 on all the line
- one with value type P2, with the correct aggregated POC value, Business transaction PEV1
one exactly the same as above, but with negative values and Business transaction PEV2.
Don't know if it is the reason for this aggregated POC nt to be used in RA calculation.
Thank you all for any help.
Patrick
Dear Experts,
I have 4 Projects, Person Responsible is same for all four projects.
In T-code OPS6 we assign SAP User Id to person responsible.
Business Work Place - Maintained you manager email address for auto forward function In order to do that select the menu path settings -->office settings -->automatic forwarding.
Here I can give one email id, any possibility of multiple emails Id's.
Please Suggest
Thanks,
Hi,
I am a HCM consultant, therefore I have zero knowledge in PS/SD.
Currently I am working on a task, where I need to create the bill on the CATS data (Time Sheet Data: HCM). I want to know how the CATS data is transferred to WBS, and how the billing of the same is done in PS the WBS element and Activity Type. I ll be transfering the time data to Internal Order (I dont know how to assign these internal orders to WBS elements) and in Activity type I ll be storing the rates of the activities/tasks. Now on the basis of these Internal type, WBS and Activity type, How can I generate a bill in PS? (We are inactivate in SD module).
A more clear explanation would be better as said, am new to PS..
regards
Tahir
Dear Guru's,
I'm very much new in project system....
My client wants validation in project system, so that goods receipt should occur only after the external activity confirmation done.
Please help....
Regards,
Pabak Rout
Dear Experts,
We are facing a problem during invoice cancelling using MR8M. Its shows the budget exceeded error for the WBS.
Error:"Budget Exceeded by 300000 INR in doc item 020 WBS element A."
Invoice posting period:2013
PO is of year 2010 (commitment carry forward have also done)
Please suggest the solution and why this error is coming. Your suggestion would be appreciable.
Regards
Shishir
Hello,
Can anybody help to do the configuration for wbs settlement with AUC other than below mentioned configuration.
1. New Asset class creation with line iteme settlement.
2. Allocaiton structure added settlement with FXA.
3. New settlement profile created with default object type FXA,document type AA and amount settlement check box activated.
but based on above mentioned configuration i am not moving forward, kindly suggest any more configuration need for this requirement.
Thanks for your advance help.
Regards,
Lakshmi.
Dear Experts,
we would like to know if you have any experiences on managing sales order stocks with reference to a PS project for which the "Project stock" indicator is settled on "Valuated stock".
The process is the following: our company provides services on customers' parts. For this reason a returns and repair process should be implemented, and parts received in sales order stock. However we would like to refer the repair orders to a PS WBS. The project should have a valuated stock. The system, unfortunately, doesn't allow to post good issues from the repair orders (Message no. KI346 Valuated project stock not allowed with customer stock: The entered WBS element ... manages a valuated project stock. At the same time, a sales order stock is managed on the sales order item. This combination is not allowed since different valuation methods within a project are not allowed.).
Any idea on how to combine these two requirements is appreciated.
Hi SAP Gurus,
I have a purchase document which was posted in 2012 for which niether GR is done nor IR is done. An amount of 30000 EUR has been assigned to a WBS element. I see tihis PO in CJI5 report but I do not see the commitment value under the column "ValCOArCur" in the CJI5 report.
I suppose this turns out to become a commitment and should appear as commitment value in CJI5 report.
Can somebody please tell me as to why this value is not appearing in the CJI5 report.
Regards,
Dwarik
Hi folks,
We have a requirement to set up a validation on the settlement rule percentage for an IO/WBS which settles to a final asset to restrict it to 1% or greater. In other words the settlement rule to final asset below 1% should not be permitted. Could you please suggest if this is doable?
Thanks!
Hi All,
I'm New to PS Module.
Enclosed is the error message i faced during creation of TCODE: CJ01 New Project with below error message.
Please guide me where is the settings for this error message . Checked : OPSJ & OPSI(No Rules Created).
Please correct me if I have missing out any configuration settings.
Thank you very much 
Trevor Wong.
Error Message : 
Checked : OPSJ
Checked : OPSI
Dear all,
I have a case:
Project belongs to plant A (which is entered in the project definition), but there's a material in project stock which is belongs to plant B (checked in MMBE, the material under this project, but under plant stock B).
Is this the normal case of SAP standard? As I never seen this case before (always project stock belongs to the same plant as entered in the project definition).
Awaiting for your answer& clarification.
Thanks and best regards,
Andy
Hi All,
I'm New to PS.
My End User have some request regarding as below :
1. Any field to key in for each WBS element line item have their own budget (key in the value)- CJ02.
2. The WBS's Budget Value will able to show out in any report such as CJI3 for the management comparison/cost control usage.
Thank you very much
Trevor Wong.
Hi,
In the standard SAP solution, if I raise a Service Purchase Requisition (Activity) against my project for e.g. £1000 then create a Purchase Order for £500 using this Purchase Requisition, I am then not able to a) use the Purchase Requisition a second time and b) change the value of the Purchase Requisition to match £500 which was used on the PO.
This causes a problem because I wish later to use the remaining £500 to create another Purchase Requisition (Activity) for a different service. Thus this would not take me over my budget.
Is there a way in which to close out the remaining £500 left on the PR which cannot be used a second time and cannot be reduced so as to make this value available to the project to be put into a new PR, thus not taking the overall multiple PR total to £1500
Any info greatly appreciated.
Many thanks,
Sam
Hi,
I need your valuable input for the below my quires:
The total value of Budget column is differ with below two different report for the same project in production system.
2- Financials -> Costs -> Budget-Related -> Budget/Actual/Varianc
But if we compere the same two reports with same project code in production copy system (all the business transaction remain same) total amount in
budget column remain same.
is it standard system behavior ? if not how to fix this issue.
Thanks in advance for your help
Hi,
Any BAPI or function modue or program to schedule whole project?
I have tried to run BDC of CJ20n but it is not working properly in production environment.
Thanks,
Harsh
My customer has following scenario.
1: There two types of projects with same budget profile(Avaibility control on Budget entry-1). Procurement is carried out on one types where budget are entered & PR/PO/GR restricted to the extent. Second type are Plant maintenace projects for handling repairs
2: They never budget second type of projects so AVAC is not activated for any of WBS( This is SAP behavior even if Availability control exist in budget profile). Good issue to Project is done for any material issued from free stock.Since AVAC is not active, they can issue any amount from free stock.
3: SAP Note is put in to fix above bug( Since there are first type of projects bypass budget) & CJBN (Recontruct availability) is run periodically. AVAC is active for second type of projects & they cannot issue any goods to Plant maint/Repair projects. They need to budget these projects as welll,but it is difficult to determine upfront repair cost upfront.
4: Suggest to have seperate budget profile(without Availability control) , but it seems it needs different project profile & hence not likely to be accptable.
5:Is there a way they can continue to issue goods to Projects without budgeting. Can we turn off message of 'Exceep budget' only form Good issue transaction
thank you for help here,
Jatin
