Hi,
The settlement of a document was not possible to be carried out in the original month. Just because of the urgencies at the month end, we settled manually to PA ( i mean, we make manual entries in PA).
However the original documnet is already in transaction CJIC to be settled.
Ee cannot removed for this transaction hence the settlement into this WBS. Is there any waty to set some entries as "already settled"?
Many thanks in advance
Jorge
HI SAP Gurus,
We have a wbs element <operating expense cost collector-Investment> the receiver mapped in CJ20n is AUC it is supposed to be cost center.
I already mapped cost center and But i am not able to remove AUC as receiver as it was greyed-out. It says "Rule cannot be deleted".
I tried to reverse settlement posted to WBS but still the same.
Appreciate if you could advise me on how can i remove the AUC as receiver. We need cost center as receiver.
Thank you!
Eve
Hello Team,
I had a operative project with below structure
C-XXXX
C-XXXX-top WBS
C-XXXX-10
Network
Internal activity 1
C-XXXX-10.1
C-XXXX-20
C-XXXX-20.1
Internal activity 2
Internal activity 3
C-XXXX-20.2
I had use above project to create new project. For new project,auto settlement rule for activity not created WHY?
If I move activity 2 to WBS C-XXXX-10, settlement rule created WHY?
Hi Experts,
Is there any possibility for determination of Profit center for a WBS based on Work Center assignment in network activity for that WBS.
work center - cost center is one to one related, cost center - profit center is again one to one related.
There will be different PC for each WBS, and it will be tedious for users to enter PC at each WBS level.
Please advice a suitable way to address the requirement.
Regards,
Murthy
Hi,
I have scenario where the posted figure for work centre does not match the activity type figure(KP26) for example
In S_ALR_87013545 report there is a posted figure of £1680 to a network when I drill-down into the figure I can see the network confirmation with 7 hours booked using activity ADMIN from the work centre I can see the cost centre of ADMIN.
Using KP26 I can see the rate of £40. Therefore I would have a posting of £280 (7*40) not £1680, does anyone know why I would have this posting? I have checked KP26 on the change log and there have not been any recent changes to the rates.
I would add that the incorrect figures are only for 1 employee, others link to the same work centre and activity type and they are posting correctly - ie the correct rate of £40 is used.
thanks
Joe
Hello,
I currently have many projects open in SAP CO that I do not want to remain open as people still have the ability to post time and costs to these projects. They are all currently in PREL status (partially released) however I would like to close them in SAP.
When I use the CJ20N transaction to close these projects, I get the an error message stating "Balance of WBS is not zero". What does this mean and how can I eliminate it?
Please can someone help?
Many thanks,
Nikesh
Hi Experts,
We are following IM Budgeting ( Budgeting Nodes) in PS. We have development
s of a form in Z development screen and budget is allocated from IM Nodes (IM42). Once the form is approved automatic project will be created by BDC program and budget will be allotted from IM nodes.
We have not designed anything for Barter system.
Its decided that we will create projects manually in case of Barter. If I create project manually, what should I opt the strategy to go for budget approval and budget allocation.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Wasim.
Hi All,
Just a small doubt I have here to ask :
Though my material ties to Network for direct consumption against NWA , Is there a way that I can bring the same material via Inventory control (for goods issue purposes) because the material quantities are huge and there is not enough space to put these materials and project requires to give custody of this bulk quantity to Warehouse.
Can this be possible either in standard or in customization?
Few Pointers:
With Q : Inventory G/L will hit to large extent ( #material valuation class and OBYC settings)
With N: I can input my Project G/L manually
I can go with Non-valuated project stock to achieve the desired results but it offer some disadvantages also .
That's the reason I want to route these materials via a WH.
All experts can share their views on it.
Thanks & Regards
Saurabh
Good day,
What would the impact be on future CO versions with existing plan data if the fiscal year-end is changed? Is there a risk of data inconsistencies/loss and how can that be mitigated?
Regards,
Willem
Hi Friends,
I had created one project in that I had assigned budget in CJ30 and same i had released budget from CJ32.
after when I open any of the budget report budget comes to Zero for all WBS element.
I had mentioned correct cost center, profit center as well in project.
Can anybody help me on this issue?
Why its coming zero?
Dear all
During CJCO run the program didn't take into account 2014 actuals. On specific WBS element we have some Assigned amound in 2014 (in CJ31), but in CJCO we have 0 in Actual column. As result, whole budget was carried forward to 2015 which is incorrect.
I've tried to reconstruct project info and availability control (CJBW, CJEN, CJBN), but it doesn't helped.
I've tried BPCARRYF report for analysis, but it returns error AP147.
Please advice what else can be checked?
Dear Experts,
I have a problem in the settlement of a project to cost center which I already asked in the SAP financials-Controlling. However I ask it here for any possible guidance from the experts on the PS module.
I want to settle the activities to WBS and then the WBS to a cost center. I have done the configurations as:
Rule for network:
1- Define Strategies for Determining Settlement Rules: 02 (to WBS element)
2- Assign Strategies and Default Rules to Network Types: type=PS02, DfR=PS1, strat=02 (to WBS element)
3- Specify Default Settlement Profiles for Networks: sett.prof.=60 (network)
Rule for WBS:
4- Determine Strategy for Settlement Rule: AA element, sett.prof.=60 (network), AcctAssCat=3 (responsible cost center)
5- Assign Strategy to Project Profile
Settlement:
6- create settlement profile (in the attached screen)
then I define the rules and strategies in the project profile and network settings and also define the responsible cost center for WBS elements. I generate the Rules by running CJB2 and the settlement rules are generated for all activities and WBSs without any problem.
However, when I run CJ88 the settlement is not executed and the result in the CJ88 is "no change".
I dont know what is the problem here. what is missed or what is any wrong setting?
Please help me on this issue. Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Hello.
After using F-48 transaction to proceed down payments for WBS no actual cost are shown in COSP table. What can be the reason?
Already tried these things:
We tried this function before with the same WBS and the same steps in creating down payments, so we are really confused why it is going that way. Any reply would be helpful.
Hello Experts
I'm facing the follonwing issue :
Client first did not want PR+Reservation when assigning Material requirement to his WBS. he only wants PR then we changed the item category from L (stock item) to N (Non stock item).
Example :
1/ Activity A asked for 150 cement bags
2/ PR created with qty 150, item category "N". No reservation created on stock
3/ We transform PR in PO, and MIGO for good receipt
4/ We're now ready ask logistics to send us these 150 cement bags so we made a manual reservation
ISSUE : we're not supposed to make a reservation superior than 150 cement bags, however users are able to ask 200 or 300 cements bags for network.
Thanks for your help
Regards
hi All,
We've recently started using ECP for our projects. ECP is done with Version 0. In CJ30, ECP values of ONLY WBS Elements which have Network – Activity are copied over to column 'Planned Total Version 0'. However, Budget values are displayed if FY – 2014 is selected for ‘Period’ (See attached).
Costing variant 'PS06 is assigned in 'Assign Costing Variant to Planning Profile'. Both Budget / Planning Profile have checkbox selected for 'Total / Annual' values. PrimCE Group - is added for Planning Profile.
Q-1:) What should be done to have all the WBSE Cost Plan values to be displayed in CJ30 even when ‘Overall’ is selected for ‘Period’ dropdown?. Pl advise.
Q-2:) Why don't the values Sum-up @ Top-level WBS even with Bottom-up scenario?.
Note: I believe if Q-1 is resolved, this will resolve Q-2 also.
-thanks
Hi, Fellows.
We have a case for SAP EC&O (CO-PS) about Results Analysis with loss ("03" Cost-Based POC Method): Where has settled for 6 periods a project which since the fourth has generated lost. By the close of the project (period 6) full settlement was executed and the result was loss accounts in accounting balancee, instead to the income statement.
The question is: Why not SAP system transfer the loss to accounting income statements?
At present we run the follow procedure:
1.- Cost Analysis (S_ALR_87013550 - Cargo en mon.objeto/ámbito consolid)
2.- Applied Overhead (CJ44 - Individual Processing, Actual)
3.- Results Analysis Proceed (KKA2 - Individual Processing)
4.- Settlement Project (CJ88 - Individual Processing)
Attachment results analysis (POC) has been performed.
Hello there,
I have installed the software. But I get MS Project version 14.0 not supported by Open PS, We are use MS Projec 2010. Now in SCN I see a person write OPENPS4MP is only supprted up until MS Project 2003. If this is the case then what else can we use to migrate PS projects into MS Project and vice versa?
Regards
Waza
Dear Gurus,
Greetings,
Please suggest me can I uncheck overall budget values in budget profile. already we have been using budget profile which is both oevrall values and annual values is checked. its configured 2 years back. Now I want to use on annual values budget profile.
My querries is can i uncheck over all values in between project duration?, is there any adverse impact on project? , wheteher any reconstruction program is needed for the exixsting project?
Please revert.
and thanx in advance
Hi,
I would kindly like to ask if someone could compare the pros and cons of managing a project with the Project Builder or via individual transactions.In particular with an emphasis on releasing PR's (ME54N, ME54, ME55, ME15N, ME21N).
Which is more versatile?
Which is more functional?
Which is less resource intensive?
Which is harder to use and thus requires more staff training hours?
Also:
What is the difference between an immediate release and an automatic release?
How do Network preferences determine the behavior of PR releases?
Sorry for all the questions and thanks so much!
Best,
Jesssica
Hi Experts,
Please see screenshot. I am running Report S_ALR_87013558, It shows incosistency in Actual Values.
Please help me to resolve this issue
Thanks
